Ketika mengintegrasikan LLM ke dalam alur kerja pengujian keamanan, sebagian besar tim инженер memulainya dengan memuat skrip wrapper sederhana di sekitar CLI security tools. Strategi ini dengan cepat terbentur dinding batas operasional: kegagalan penanganan state, kegagalan saat output perkakas terlalu besar, hilangnya konteks auditability, dan eksekusi instruksi tanpa kendali terukur. 

Proyek **CyberStrikeAI** yang dikembangkan oleh **Ed1s0nZ** menjawab tantangan ini secara mendasar. CyberStrikeAI dibangun dari awal menggunakan bahasa Go untuk menyediakan sistem aksi terorganisir tempat niat (intent) diterjemahkan menjadi eksekusi teratur, bukti operasional disimpan secara persistent, dan setiap langkah pengetesan memperkuat langkah berikutnya.

## Arsitektur Utama dan Orchestration Agentic

 CyberStrikeAI menggabungkan komponen pengeksekusi agen, integrasi alat berbasis Model Context Protocol (MCP), arsitektur RAG, dan model rantai serangan (attack-chain) ke dalam satu ruang kerja tunggal yang dapat diaudit.

```
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                           CyberStrikeAI                               |
|                                                                       |
|  +--------------------+   +---------------------+   +--------------+  |
|  |  Web Console / UI  |   | Burp Suite Extension|   | Browser Ext. |  |
|  +---------+----------+   +----------+----------+   +-------+------+  |
|            |                         |                      |         |
|            +-------------------------+----------------------+         |
|                                      |                                |
|  +-----------------------------------v-----------------------------+  |
|  |                 Go Core Server (Go 1.25+)                       |  |
|  |                                                                 |  |
|  |  +---------------------+   +---------------------------------+  |  |
|  |  |  Eino Orchestrator  |   |      MCP Tool Integration       |  |  |
|  |  |  - Single Agent     |   |  - HTTP / stdio / SSE           |  |  |
|  |  |  - Plan-Execute     |   |  - Circuit Breakers             |  |  |
|  |  |  - Supervisor Mode  |   |  - Unified Output Caps          |  |  |
|  |  +----------+----------+   +----------------+----------------+  |  |
|  |             |                               |                   |  |
|  |             +---------------+---------------+                   |  |
|  |                             |                                   |  |
|  |  +--------------------------v--------------------------------+  |  |
|  |  | SQLite Persistence, RBAC, Asset & Vulnerability Mgmt       |  |  |
|  |  +-----------------------------------------------------------+  |  |
|  +-----------------------------------------------------------------+  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
```

Orkestrasi sistem dijalankan oleh mesin orkestrasi **Eino**. Tidak seperti runner sederhana, Eino mendukung beberapa mode operasi tingkat lanjut:

1. **Single-agent execution:** Mengeksekusi tugas linear dengan instruksi spesifik.
2. **Deep execution:** Penelusuran mendalam terhadap tugas yang memerlukan iterasi kompleks.
3. **Plan-Execute:** Memisahkan tahap perencanaan strategi dari tahap eksekusi perkakas.
4. **Supervisor multi-agent mode:** Orkestrasi terdistribusi di mana agen penyelia mengoordinasikan sub-agen spesialis.

Selain itu, alur kerja grafis (Graph Workflows) memungkinkan penggabungan Agen, perkakas, kondisi logis, persetujuan manusia (*human approvals*), dan output ke dalam alur kerja yang dapat digunakan kembali.

## Tata Kelola Eksekusi Perkakas dan Ketahanan Sistem

Salah satu masalah kritis dalam penggunaan agen AI pada pengujian keamanan adalah manajemen eksekusi blocking dan potensi luapan memori dari stdout perkakas seperti `nmap` atau `nuclei`. CyberStrikeAI menyelesaikan masalah ini melalui mekanisme **Tool Execution Governance**:

* **Worker Offloading & Resumable Polling:** Pemanggilan MCP/tool yang bersifat blocking dijalankan di worker independen dengan *bounded agent waits*. Sistem mendukung *polling* melalui `execution_id` yang dapat dipulihkan (*resumable*).
* **Circuit Breakers & Concurrency Limits:** Setiap server MCP dilindungi oleh *per-server circuit breaker* dan pembatasan konkurensi untuk mencegah *cascading failures*.
* **Output Caps & Result Governance:** Hasil eksekusi ditapis dengan batas ukuran terpadu (*unified output caps*). Hanya data terkompres/terbatas yang disimpan dan ditampilkan untuk melindungi konteks LLM dan UI dari beban berlebih, sembari tetap menjaga integritas *audit log* di basis data SQLite.

| Komponen Tata Kelola | Mekanisme Proteksi | Dampak Operasional |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Circuit Breakers** | Memutus koneksi jika server MCP mengalami eror berturut-turut | Mencegah bottleneck dan kehabisan sumber daya sistem |
| **Result Governance** | Pemotongan output perkakas berukuran besar (*capped output*) | Menjaga histori percakapan dari lonjakan token LLM |
| **Human-in-the-Loop** | Mode persetujuan (*approval modes*) & allowlist alat | Mencegah tindakan destruktif tanpa verifikasi operator |

## Manajemen Aset dan Attack Chain Modeling

CyberStrikeAI memfasilitasi operasi keamanan terotorisasi melalui fitur manajemen aset dan visualisasi rantai serangan. Sistem ini mampu mengonsumsi data dari 100+ resep alat YAML bawaan yang mencakup berbagai fase pengujian:

```
CyberStrikeAI Toolset Overview:
├── Network Scanners       : nmap, masscan, rustscan, arp-scan, nbtscan
├── Web & App Scanners     : sqlmap, nikto, dirb, gobuster, feroxbuster, ffuf, httpx
├── Vulnerability Scanners : nuclei, wpscan, wafw00f, dalfox, xsser
├── Post-Exploitation      : linpeas, winpeas, mimikatz, bloodhound, impacket, responder
└── Cloud & Containers     : prowler, trivy, docker-bench-security, kube-hunter
```

Sistem manajemen aset secara otomatis menormalisasi dan mengeliminasi duplikasi domain, IP, port, serta layanan. Data ini dihubungkan langsung ke modul **Projects and Attack Chains**, yang memungkinkan pemetaan fakta lintas sesi, penilaian risiko (*risk scoring*), visualisasi grafis, dan pemutaran ulang langkah demi langkah (*step-by-step replay*).

Untuk kebutuhan operasi yang disetujui, platform ini juga menyediakan modul terintegrasi seperti **WebShell Management** dengan terminal virtual dan **Built-in C2** yang dilengkapi *encrypted beacons*, antrean tugas, dan event siaran langsung (*live events*).

## Konfigurasi dan Deployment

Persyaratan sistem dasar untuk menjalankan CyberStrikeAI adalah Go 1.25+ dan Python 3.10+. Peluncuran aplikasi dapat dilakukan dengan satu perintah melalui skrip `run.sh`:

```bash
git clone https://github.com/Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI.git
cd CyberStrikeAI
chmod +x run.sh && ./run.sh
```

Skrip `run.sh` secara otomatis memeriksa lingkungan Go dan Python, membuat *virtual environment* Python di `venv/`, mengunduh dependensi Go, mengompilasi biner, dan menjalankan server web secara aman dengan TLS lokal.

### Pengaturan AI Channel (`config.yaml`)

Konfigurasi saluran AI mendukung multi-provider dan dapat diatur melalui UI Web di **System Settings → Basic Settings → AI Channel Configuration** atau secara langsung melalui file `config.yaml`:

```yaml
server:
  host: "127.0.0.1"
  port: 8080

ai:
  default_channel: openai-main
  channels:
    openai-main:
      name: OpenAI Main
      provider: openai_compatible
      api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
      base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
      model: "gpt-4o"
      max_total_tokens: 120000
      max_completion_tokens: 16384
```

### Prosedur Pembaruan (*Upgrade Flow*)

CyberStrikeAI menyediakan mekanisme pembaruan satu langkah yang mempertahankan kustomisasi lokal pada direktori `tools/`, `roles/`, dan `skills/`:

```bash
chmod +x upgrade.sh && ./upgrade.sh --yes
```

Skrip ini membuat cadangan otomatis direktori `data/` dan file `config.yaml` ke dalam `.upgrade-backup/`, mengunduh rilis terbaru dari GitHub, memperbarui struktur skema, dan merestart server secara aman.

## Integrasi Ekosistem Plugin

Untuk mendukung alur kerja analis keamanan tanpa mengganggu preferensi kerja mereka, CyberStrikeAI menyediakan dua plugin utama:

1. **Burp Suite Extension:** Terletak pada `plugins/burp-suite/cyberstrikeai-burp-extension/`, memungkinkan integrasi lalu lintas HTTP terautentikasi langsung ke platform CyberStrikeAI.
2. **Browser Extension (Chrome / Edge):** Terletak pada `plugins/browser-extension/cyberstrikeai-browser-extension/`, menangkap lalu lintas jaringan dari DevTools dan mengirimkannya ke CyberStrikeAI untuk analisis berbantuan AI.

Dengan kombinasi Go core yang tangguh, integrasi protokol MCP, serta kontrol tata kelola yang ketat, CyberStrikeAI karya Ed1s0nZ menetapkan standar arsitektur baru bagi platform pengujian keamanan berbasis AI.

## References
- https://github.com/Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI

Ed1s0nZ introduces CyberStrikeAI, a Go-based platform unifying Eino orchestration, MCP tools, and governed execution for authorized offensive operations. Discover how its architecture balances multi-agent workflows with strict operational limits.

Why Autonomous Security Workflows Fail Without Governance: Inside Ed1s0nZ CyberStrikeAI Engine

Reggi

## Deconstructing the AI Trading Agent Architecture

Most quantitative strategies die the moment they touch live market feeds. Hard-coded rules break during volatility spikes, and human execution degrades the second real capital is on the line. Moving to an autonomous agent architecture changes the equation completely. Instead of executing brittle static heuristics, an AI-driven trading system continuously parses the market state, surfaces non-linear patterns, and manages policy execution across shifting market conditions.

The core motivation behind autonomous agents in market contexts is eliminating emotional latency and cognitive bias. Human traders fight greed, fear, and cognitive exhaustion. An agent treats the market as an adversarial data environment. It consumes massive, firehose-volume data feeds in milliseconds, runs deterministic inference, and routes orders strictly aligned with the underlying strategy specification.

```
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                             TRADING AGENT RUNTIME                             |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  [ Raw Feeds: Ticks, Calendars, Sentiments ] 
                       │
                       ▼
  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │   1. Ingestion & Normalization Layer    │ ──> [ Data Hygiene & Lineage ]
  └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                       │
                       ▼
  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │   2. Feature & Model Engine (SL / RL)   │ ──> [ Policy / Signal Output ]
  └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                       │
                       ▼
  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │   3. Inference & Risk Management        │ ──> [ Drawdown & Position Limits ]
  └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                       │
                       ▼
  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │   4. Execution OMS (FIX / REST / WS)    │ ──> [ Venues: CEX / DEX / Brokers ]
  └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
```

---

## End-to-End Pipeline Architecture

Building a production-ready trading agent requires a modular pipeline where each stage isolates a distinct operational concern. If any link in the chain introduces latency or corrupted inputs, downstream execution fails.

```
+---------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
| Pipeline Stage            | Core Responsibility              | Primary Focus & Constraints                |
+---------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
| Ingestion & Normalization | Ingest heterogeneous raw data     | Prevent data corruption, handle sanitation |
| Feature & ML Stack        | State estimation & policy learning| SL for forecasting, RL for policy search   |
| Inference & Risk Engine   | Signal generation & safety bounds | Max drawdown caps, position sizing limits  |
| Execution OMS             | Venue routing & order management  | Low latency, FIX/REST/WebSocket protocols  |
+---------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
```

### 1. Ingestion and Normalization Layer

The pipeline begins by aggregating heterogeneous market feeds. This includes raw historical and live price action, volume profiles, macroeconomic calendar releases, technical indicators, and alternative inputs like news sentiment and on-chain metrics. 

Data hygiene is the primary operational constraint here. High-throughput ingestion requires aggressive sanitation routines to prevent invalid ticks or mismatched timestamps from corrupting feature calculation.

### 2. Feature Engineering and Model Topologies

Once data is cleaned and normalized, it enters the machine learning stack. The computational architecture is typically split by execution objective:

*   **Supervised Learning:** Deployed primarily for directional forecasting and trend classification tasks. These models solve standard regression or classification problems to predict short-term price movements.
*   **Reinforcement Learning (RL):** Applied as the primary policy discovery engine. The RL agent interacts with a simulated market backtesting environment, learning optimal action maps through trial and error. Rather than optimizing purely for raw directional accuracy, the objective function rewards policies that maximize risk-adjusted performance metrics such as the Sharpe and Sortino ratios.

### 3. Inference and Risk Engine

The model outputs raw decision signals: Long, Short, Flat, or continuous position sizing vectors. Before these signals reach the order router, they must pass through an intermediary risk layer. 

This layer acts as an invariant guardrail. It checks the generated actions against hard risk boundaries, including portfolio-level max drawdown limits, single-asset position limits, and portfolio correlation caps. If a model output violates a risk threshold, the engine clamps or discards the order.

### 4. Order Management System (OMS) and Execution

The vetted signals pass directly to the OMS. This system handles protocol communication, connecting downstream to venues such as centralized exchanges, decentralized exchanges, or broker APIs using FIX, REST, and WebSocket connections.

```bash
# Conceptual flow: Signal verification through execution
[INFERENCE: BUY AAPL 500] ──> [RISK-CHECK: PASS] ──> [OMS ROUTER] ──> [VENUE: FIX/REST]
```

At this stage, low-latency optimizations such as colocation and kernel bypass come into play to minimize slippage. While the engine runs headless, comprehensive observability systems manage structured logging, alerting, and real-time PnL attribution to maintain system health.

---

## The Production Bottlenecks

Moving an AI trading agent from an offline backtest to a live production environment introduces non-trivial distributed systems and algorithmic failure modes.

### Non-Stationarity and Regime Switching

Financial time series violate the fundamental assumption of identically distributed data. Markets are adversarial and non-stationary. An agent trained exclusively on a low-volatility bull market will experience catastrophic policy degradation when sudden liquidity shocks or structural regime changes occur. Systems require adaptive architectures, using approaches like online continuous learning, ensemble switching, and meta-controllers to monitor market state shifts and dynamically adjust the active policy.

### Overfitting and In-Sample Traps

Backtests are notorious for providing false confidence. An unconstrained policy search can easily memorize historical noise, resulting in stellar backtest Sharpe ratios that immediately drop to negative returns in live trading. Mitigating this failure mode requires strict validation methodologies:

*   Purged cross-validation to account for temporal dependencies.
*   Walk-forward optimization across distinct historical periods.
*   Synthetic data generation to stress-test policies against extreme liquidity events.

### Data Lineage and Bias

Model accuracy is bounded by data integrity. Production systems must defend against survivorship bias, which occurs when delisted tickers are excluded from historical datasets, artificially inflating performance. Missing ticks, split-adjustment errors, and malformed quotes will poison the policy. Traceable data lineage and automated validation pipelines are critical infrastructure requirements.

### Compliance and Explainability (XAI)

As an agent's managed capital scales, the operational surface expands into regulatory compliance. Operating within frameworks such as MiFID II and rigorous risk management standards requires auditable execution traces. Black-box models must be paired with explainable AI techniques and immutable logging to reconstruct every decision path taken by the policy during production runs.

---

## The Path Forward

The evolution of financial foundation models like FinGPT and BloombergGPT, combined with advancements in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) alignment, is accelerating the transition of autonomous agents into systematic fund workflows and advanced retail stacks. When architected with robust risk controls and hardened data pipelines, these systems do more than automate trade execution: they establish a deterministic, scalable foundation for continuous risk management in volatile markets.

## Reference
*   https://github.com/TauricResearch/TradingAgents

An engineering deep dive into the TradingAgents framework. Learn how autonomous agents process data pipelines, execute risk-constrained policies, and handle market regime shifts without emotional bias.

Building Autonomous Trading Engines: Architecture, Execution Pipelines, and Production Pitfalls

Eliminate context switching and manage custom domain email directly inside Gmail. Configure unified inbound ingestion and Send As permissions seamlessly.

The Unified Inbox Architecture: Routing Custom Domain Webmail Through Gmail

Eliminate manual rotation bottlenecks, thermal lag, and biological variance by building an automated, headless AC-powered egg incubator setup.

Stop Acting as a Manual Cron Job: Engineering an Automated AC-Powered Incubator

Ditch mains AC for a stable, low-voltage DC egg incubator. Learn how dedicated temp and humidity control modules optimize poultry yields.

Why AC Mains Are Ruining Your Hatch Rates: Building a Reliable Low-Voltage DC Incubator

A technical systems breakdown of battery-powered ride-on car assembly for ages 2 to 7 (50kg max), covering safety envelopes, parental remote control, and multimedia architecture.

Architecting the Scaled EV: Remote Override Logic and Multimedia Integration for Electric Ride-On Chassis

Learn how to build a reliable smart power strip using NodeMCU and Blynk for wireless and voice-controlled electrical management.

Why Remote Power Switching Fails in Hardware Prototypes and How NodeMCU with Blynk Solves It

Fix persistent macOS bugs, wipe disk bloat, or prep for resale. Master Internet Recovery (Command+Option+R), APFS reformatting, and clean installation.

#ai-architecture

Getting Lastest Post..

Trending This Month